Well I hate to tell them but their clever little bit of backroom testing that stupid Kolar leaked details of in his book might just have provided proof of 2 extra intrudersĪt least two people professionally connected to him have thought him to be a "fine man" as u/searchingirl says and were prepared to sign sworn affidavits to that effect: It is pretty clear that when they did those tests that they were trying to prove either a Ramsey handled those items during commission of the crime or that the items were contaminated by investigators because along with Patsy, John Burke they had Van Tassel, Lou Smit, John Pickering and Trip DeMuth tested in the same batch. And what I would also like to know is why hell did they do the tests anyway? Or maybe he was foolish enough to trust Horita who did those tests in conjunctionwith Harmer behind Lacy's back. Kolar was either deliberately misleading or he was just too dumb to put two and two together and realise that Lacy had no idea about these tests. You can now find everything he says dubious. Yet, Kolar has such a difficult time understanding. Six months before the results of those Touch DNA tests were known. Lacy’s exoneration letter was sent in July 2008. Unwilling to look at “all of the evidence”? Lacy didn’t have “all the evidence” to see. Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet? (Kindle Locations 5266-5362). Why was Mary Lacy’s office so unwilling to look at all of the evidence that had been collected over the course of this investigation? Mary Lacy made the decision to withhold this information from the public when she apologized to, and exonerated, the Ramsey family.įor what it’s worth, here is my personal observation and my takeaway: For reasons beyond my comprehension, there has been a total lack of objectivity on the part of the prosecutor’s office regarding the DNA in this case, and I have a difficult time understanding why the totality of the Touch DNA testing evidence was not released to the public by Lacy when the family was exonerated in the death of their daughter. Touch DNA testing discovered the presence of two additional, unknown samples of male DNA on the implements that had been used to kill JonBenét. These trace “Touch DNA” samples were genetically unique from one another, and were believed to belong to different individuals. He went on to report, however, that additional samples of trace male DNA had been discovered on the cord used in the wrist bindings, and the garrote that had killed JonBenét. What I viewed as significant however, was the revelation that Horita had disclosed during the task force meeting held in February 2009: Horita confirmed the public announcements Lacy had made about matching DNA found in the leggings worn by JonBenét. View All Hide Popular View Discussion Hide Discussion View Questions Hide Questions View Theories Hide Theories View Media Hide Media
LESSONS FROM THE JONBENET RAMSEY CASE MOD
False or misleading information may be removed at mod discretion.Īccounts must be at least 3 days old and have minimum 15 karma to comment or post.
No memes, reaction gifs, crass jokes, etc.ĭo not state rumors or speculation as facts. Strive to submit quality posts and comments. Guide For New Users See Our Wiki For Various Resources Community Rules JonBenét Patricia Ramsey was a six-year-old girl found dead in the basement of her Boulder, Colorado home on December 26, 1996. We are a true crime community dedicated to exploring case facts, evidence and theories surrounding the death of JonBenét Ramsey.
0 kommentar(er)
